1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 251 A.2d
  5. 251 A.2d 559 (1969)
 

DADDS v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY

251 A.2d 559 (1969)

Fay L. DADDS and Betty C. Dadds, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

February 24, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. Wilson Redfearn, of Tybout & Redfearn, Wilmington, for defendants below, appellants.

Richard E. Poole, of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellee.

WOLCOTT, C. J., and CAREY and HERRMANN, JJ., sitting.

HERRMANN, Justice:

This is an action by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company against Fay L. Dadds for negligence in operating her automobile onto its tracks in the path of a train, resulting in damage to the train.

The determinative issue is whether the Superior Court was correct in granting summary judgment to the Railroad Company on the ground that Miss Dadds was guilty of negligence as a matter of law. We think not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases