Order entered August 1, 1968, reversed on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and motion to vacate the demand for bill of particulars granted.
Defendant should not be required to detail in a bill of particulars the statutes and decisional law upon which it relies. (See Gevinson v. Kirkeby-Natus Corp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.