1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 408 F.2d
  5. 408 F.2d 364 (1969)
 

ROMERO v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 21686, 21686-A.

408 F.2d 364 (1969)

David Perea ROMERO and Ronald Eugene Tickle, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 12, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Sheridan (argued), of Simon, Sheridan, Murphy, Thornton & Medvene, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Jo Ann Dunne (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge.

ROGER D. FOLEY, District Judge:

Appellant Romero was found guilty after a court trial on a two-count indictment charging violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. Romero's counsel specifies as error the following:

"1. Romero's arrest without a warrant was illegal as it lacked the prerequisite probable cause. * * * "2. Romero's statements after his arrest are not admissible into evidence and should have been suppressed as said statements were obtained in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases