1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 306 F.Supp.
  5. 306 F.Supp. 460 (1969)
 

HAMMOND LEAD PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3915; Protest 67/77548-5928.

306 F.Supp. 460 (1969)

HAMMOND LEAD PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES (Ralph Valls, Party-in-Interest).

United States Customs Court, First Division.

November 7, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alvord & Alvord, Washington, D. C. (Albert H. Greene, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian S. Goldstein, New York City, trial attorney), for defendant.

Chapman, Di Salle & Friedman, Washington, D. C. (Paul A. Lenzini, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for party-in-interest.

Before WATSON, MALETZ, and RE, Judges.

MALETZ, Judge:

The single question in this case — which comes before the court on an American manufacturer's protest — is whether the Mexican Government, directly or indirectly, bestows a bounty or grant, within the meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1303), upon the manufacture, production or exportation of a lead oxide known as litharge. Section 303 provides:

Whenever any country, dependency, colony, province...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases