The Appellate Division held that plaintiff as a lienor for materials and labor furnished for the improvement of privately owned real property has no direct cause of action against the bonding company under a performance bond issued pursuant to a contract with the private owner of the improved land in which a town, to which the land was later transferred, was the obligee.
The bonding company undertook...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.
GET STARTED
OR