1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 306 F.Supp.
  5. 306 F.Supp. 440 (1969)
 

FILBIN & CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3897; Protest Nos. 67/49580-8468 and 67/49593-8467.

306 F.Supp. 440 (1969)

W. R. FILBIN & CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

October 9, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe A. Walters, Minneapolis, Minn. (Thomas A. Keller, III, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for plaintiff.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian S. Goldstein, New York City, trial atty.), for defendant.

Before RAO, Chief Judge, and FORD and NEWMAN, Judges.

NEWMAN, Judge.

The issue to be decided in these two consolidated protests is the proper tariff classification of so-called "Crosby-Clip Bases." It appears that a "Crosby-Clip" is a wire rope clip, which is used to hold together two pieces or two ends of wire rope. The imported articles, after completion in the United States, become a component part of such wire rope clips, viz., bases.

The merchandise (bases) was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases