1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 42 Wis.2d
  5. 42 Wis.2d 699 (1969)
 

HOEFT v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORP.

No. 195.

42 Wis.2d 699 (1969)

168 N.W.2d 134

HOEFT, Respondent, v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 3, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Alan M. Clack of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Clack.

For the respondent there was a brief by Robert F. Buech and Kersten & McKinnon, attorneys, and E. Campion Kersten of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by E. Campion Kersten.

HEFFERNAN, J.

Did the trial court err in instructing that the pedestrian had the right-of-way in crossing a street at an intersection where intersecting vehicular traffic was required to stop for posted signs

The trial judge, in essence, gave the jury the standard Wisconsin Jury Instruction, Civil, Part I, 1255, which recites that at a crosswalk or at an intersection not controlled by traffic control signals or by a traffic officer, the operator of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases