1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 169 S.E.2d
  5. 169 S.E.2d 527 (1969)
 

POPLIN v. LEDBETTER

No. 6919SC380.

169 S.E.2d 527 (1969)

6 N.C. App. 170

A. L. POPLIN et ux. v. P. L. LEDBETTER.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 17, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cole & Chesson, by James L. Cole, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

Hartsell, Hartsell & Mills, by William L. Mills, Jr., and K. Michael Koontz, Concord, for plaintiffs-appellees.

HEDRICK, Judge.

The appellant's assignments of error numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 29 and 30, challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiffs' evidence to carry the case to the jury on the issue of punitive damages.

In Vail v. Vail, 233 N.C. 109, 63 S.E.2d 202, the Supreme Court of North Carolina, speaking through Johnson, J., said:

"Fraud has no all-embracing definition. Because of the multifarious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases