1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 42 Wis.2d
  5. 42 Wis.2d 637 (1969)
 

BOARD OF SCH. DIRECTORS OF MILWAUKEE v. WERC

Nos. 213, 214, 215.

42 Wis.2d 637 (1969)

168 N.W.2d 92

BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Petitioner and Respondent: MILWAUKEE TEACHERS' UNION LOCAL 252 and another, Cross-Petitioners and Respondents, v. WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant. MILWAUKEE TEACHERS' EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant. MILWAUKEE TEACHERS' UNION LOCAL 252, affiliated with American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, Respondent, v. WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant: BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Intervening Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 3, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by David J. Hanson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William H. Wilker, assistant attorney general.

For the petitioner-respondent Board of School Directors of the city of Milwaukee there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, Harry G. Slater, deputy city attorney, and Carl F. Kinnel, assistant city attorney.

For the petitioner-respondent Milwaukee Teachers' Education Association there was a brief by Lawton & Cates and Robert C. Kelly, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Kelly.

For the petitioner-respondent Milwaukee Teachers' Union Local 252 there was a brief by Goldberg, Previant & Uelmen and John S. Williamson, Jr., all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Williamson.

HANLEY, J.

The following issues are presented in this appeal:

(1) Is it a prohibited practice within the meaning of sec. 111.70 (3) (a), Stats., for a municipal employer and the certified exclusive representative of its employees to enter into an agreement for the exclusive checkoff of dues;

(2) Is it a prohibited practice within the meaning of sec. 111.70 (3) (a), Stats., for the school board to deny a representative of a minority union the right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases