1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 254 Md.
  5. 254 Md. 423 (1969)
 

SPINTMAN v. C. & P. TEL. CO.

[No. 330, September Term, 1968.]

254 Md. 423 (1969)

255 A.2d 304

SPINTMAN, ET AL. v. THE CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 1, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel I. Sherry for appellants.

Robert A. Levetown, with whom were Jerrold V. Powers, Sasscer, Clagett, Powers & Channing, Howard C. Anderson and L. Manning Muntzing on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, BARNES, FINAN and SMITH, JJ.

FINAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Daniel A. Spintman and Judith A. Spintman, his wife (appellants), are subscribers to the "262" exchange service of the appellee, Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland. Appellants brought an action in assumpsit for themselves, and on behalf of all other similarly situated subscribers to the "262" exchange service in the City of Bowie, and other areas in Prince George's County, Maryland, that are not within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases