SCHOFIELD v. UEBEL

[No. 324, September Term, 1968.]

254 Md. 402 (1969)

254 A.2d 655

SCHOFIELD v. UEBEL, ET VIR

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 30, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Clarke for appellant.

James S. McAuliffe, Jr., with whom were Heeney, McAuliffe & McAuliffe on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, BARNES, FINAN and SMITH, JJ.


SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Stung by judgments totaling $73,210.00 in a case where he admitted liability and where the medical expenses arising out of an automobile accident were only $808.86, appellant (Schofield) complains to this Court, raising four questions: (1) whether plaintiffs sustained their burden of proof when there was a marked difference between the percentages of estimated disability presented by plaintiffs' experts; (2) whether the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases