The trial judge held on sufficient evidence that the second mortgage held by appellant was invalid as an unlawful preference proscribed by Florida Statutes § 608.55 (1965), F.S.A. He correctly allowed amendment of the pleadings to conform to proof that the holder of the second mortgage paid $1300.12 to the holder of the first mortgage to protect its security position, but did not in the final decree make...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
