1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 107 N.J.
  5. 107 N.J. Super. 545 (1969)
 

RUVOLDT v. TUMULTY

107 N.J. Super. 545 (1969)

259 A.2d 491

HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, AND HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, JR., PLAINTIFFS, v. JAMES A. TUMULTY, JR., PROSECUTOR OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, ARTHUR J. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JOSEPH T. BRADY, SUPERINTENDENT OF ELECTIONS OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided June 19, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr. for plaintiffs (Messrs. Ruvoldt & Ruvoldt, attorneys, pro se).

Mr. Gregory J. Castano, Assistant County Prosecutor, for defendant (Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney pro se).

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, did not appear.

Mr. Joseph T. Brady, Superintendent of Elections of Hudson County, appeared pro se.

ARTASERSE, A.J.S.C.

This is the return date of an order to show cause why the prosecutor of Hudson County should not be enjoined from presenting to the Hudson County grand jury testimony and evidence of allegedly fraudulent challenge permits employed in the June 3, 1969 primary. The order further directs the prosecutor to show cause why he should not be superseded in this investigation by the Attorney General and why he ought not recognize Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr. as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases