1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 452 P.2d
  5. 452 P.2d 188 (1969)
 

VAN ORMAN v. NELSON

No. 8672.

452 P.2d 188 (1969)

80 N.M. 119

C.L. VAN ORMAN and C.W. Van Orman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jess R. NELSON and Noemie J. Nelson, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 24, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jess R. Nelson, pro se.

Willard F. Kitts, John P. Eastham, Albuquerque, for appellants.

Stephenson, Campbell & Olmsted, Santa Fe, for appellees.

OPINION

NOBLE, Chief Justice.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court exceeded the directions of the mandate and opinion of this court upon remand following a prior appeal in Van Orman v. Nelson, 78 N.M. 11, 427 P.2d 896.

It is firmly established in this jurisdiction that upon remand the district court has only such jurisdiction as the opinion and mandate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases