LOVE v. ZARTMAN


455 P.2d 176 (1969)

William LOVE, Appellant, v. William V. ZARTMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided June 18, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Schedler, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.

David C. Landis, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Morrison & Bailey, George M. Joseph, and Robert H. Hollister, Portland.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

A plaintiff who sustained the loss of a testicle through the alleged negligence of a surgeon appeals a judgment for the defendant. The appeal was heard in banc because it purported to present an important question upon the extent to which a plaintiff without medical testimony can rely upon res ipsa loquitur to carry his case to the jury.

Upon examining the record after oral argument, we find that we cannot reach the question suggested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases