EISLAND v. PECK


26 Misc.2d 601 (1969)

Sol Eisland, Plaintiff, v. Maurice T. Peck et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Maurice T. Peck et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sol Eisland et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Supreme Court, Oneida County.

May 12, 1960


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernardi, Zogby & Murad for plaintiff; William R. Goldbas for Maurice T. Peck and another, defendants (in Action No. 1). William R. Goldbas for plaintiffs; Bernardi, Zogby & Murad for defendants (in Action No. 2).


JOHN H. FARNHAM, J.

In the first action above plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite. The motion on same has been argued by counsel before the court and has been submitted for the court's determination.

It appears that the second above action is pending in Justices' Court in the City of Utica, New York, wherein the defendants, Peck, in the first above action are the plaintiffs, and the plaintiff in the first above action is the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases