TANTUM v. HURLEY, ET AL.


107 N.J. Super. 511 (1969)

259 A.2d 474

WILFRED TANTUM, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM E. HURLEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. CHARLESETTA HOPKINS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM E. HURLEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 25, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John C. Givens argued the cause for appellant Tantum (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel S. Sagotsky argued the cause for appellants Hopkins.

Mr. William O. Barnes, Jr., argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, P.J.A.D.

This appeal, involving the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, is from an order of the trial court denying plaintiffs' application to have their judgments against a driver of an uninsured motor vehicle paid out of the Fund. The ruling was bottomed on the trial court's determination that none of the plaintiffs was a "qualified person" under the Fund Law.

The undisputed facts of the case are as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases