1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 295 F.Supp.
  5. 295 F.Supp. 319 (1969)
 

ENLITE PRODUCTS CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3682; Protests 63/18668-93822, etc.

295 F.Supp. 319 (1969)

ENLITE PRODUCTS CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

January 28, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allerton deC. Tompkins, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Carl Eardley, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., (Charles P. Deem and Bernard J. Babb, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before RAO, Chief Judge, and FORD, Judge.

RAO, Chief Judge:

The merchandise covered by the protests herein, consolidated at the trial, described on the invoices as "Enlite" cycle lanterns, chrome plated, was imported from Hong Kong and entered at the port of Philadelphia. The merchandise was assessed with duty at 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 371 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas.Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, as parts of bicycles.

Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases