1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 394 U.S.
  5. 394 U.S. 215 (1969)
 

SUMRALL v. KIDD

No. 1167, Misc.

394 U.S. 215 (1969)

SUMRALL v. KIDD ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 10, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant.

Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases