DOWLING v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 67-992.

300 F.Supp. 307 (1969)

Mary DOWLING and James Dowling, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

June 9, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard DiSalle, Canonsburg, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Stein & Winters, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.


OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Defendant's Answer in this case raised the defense of lack of jurisdictional amount in controversy, and this was repeated in the pretrial narrative. Under the pretrial rules of this court after all discovery is closed the parties must file a pretrial narrative statement and a pretrial stipulation covering all of the issues, evidence, witnesses, exhibits, itemization and damages which will be presented at trial, and by which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases