1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 307 F.Supp.
  5. 307 F.Supp. 291 (1969)
 

TUCKER v. CAPITOL MACHINE, INC.

Civ. No. 69-26.

307 F.Supp. 291 (1969)

Richard E. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. CAPITOL MACHINE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

December 11, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Markowitz, Kagen & Griffith, York, Pa., for plaintiff; George Psoras, Baltimore, Md., of counsel.

Dowling & Dowling, Harrisburg, Pa., for defendant.

SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.

This is a ruling on a motion by defendant for summary judgment.

The complaint, filed January 21, 1969, alleges that on April 20, 1966, plaintiff, while employed at Williamson Veneer Company, was injured when a veneer clipper machine, sold to Williamson by defendant, was unintentionally activated. The complaint sets forth three causes of action: negligence in the design and manufacture of the machine; implied warranties of merchantability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases