CAVITRON CORP. v. ULTRASONIC RESEARCH CORPORATION

No. 66-856-Civ.

301 F.Supp. 293 (1969)

CAVITRON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ULTRASONIC RESEARCH CORPORATION, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. Florida, Miami Division.

March 18, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brumbaugh, Graves, Donohue & Raymond, New York City, Feibelman, Friedman, Hyman & Britton, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff.

Klein, Tannenbaum & McGovern, John Cyril Malloy, Miami, Fla., Carl V. Wisner, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for defendants, Sonic Industries Corp., John C. Adams, Adrienne J. Adams, Zoltan Haydu, Dorothy Haydu, John Eubanks and Marcel Marovitch.


FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

EATON, District Judge.

This patent infringement action came on for non-jury trial before the Court. The Court heard testimony, received evidence, heard argument by counsel and considered the proposed findings and conclusions presented by counsel. Therefore, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

I. NATURE OF ACTION, JURISDICTION, PARTIES

1. This is an action under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases