DAVIS v. GUISE

No. 2547.

226 So.2d 363 (1969)

Charles A. DAVIS and Paulette Davis, His Wife, Appellants, v. Ernest H. GUISE and Frances C. Guise, His Wife, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

September 17, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Reiss, Orlando, for appellants.

Robert H. Roth, of Roth, Segal & Levine, Orlando, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

The points presented on this appeal by the appellants involve factual issues which were resolved against the appellants by the trial court. The record on appeal does not contain a transcript of the testimony which was before the trial court. We are, therefore, unable on the basis of the record before this court to conclude that the appellants have demonstrated the existence of reversible error. For this reason the judgment appealed from is affirmed. See...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases