REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. DIAMOND PROPERTIES

Docket No. 1017.

271 Cal.App.2d 315 (1969)

76 Cal. Rptr. 269

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DIAMOND PROPERTIES, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

March 28, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Forrest E. Macomber and A. Grant Macomber for Defendant and Appellant.

John A. Wilson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Monroe Langdon, City Attorney, Daley, Brewer, Patridge & Garrett and Richard B. Daley as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.


STONE, J.

Diamond Properties appeals from a judgment in an eminent domain action wherein it was determined that appellant had no compensable interest in property condemned by respondent, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton.

On November 16, 1960, respondent gave notice to the owners and occupants of property in a nine-block area in Stockton that it intended to acquire the property by purchase or condemnation. At that time appellant was operating a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases