Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In our opinion, the trier of the facts was warranted in not adopting the opinion of appellant's medical expert as controlling in the case. Considering all the proof elicited upon the trial, the court (sitting without a jury) was free to reject the testimony of appellant's physician both as to the extent of appellant's 1963 injury and the causal relationship between that injury and the March, 1965, accident as...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.