1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 295 F.Supp.
  5. 295 F.Supp. 289 (1969)
 

STUDNER v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3679; Protest 61/10149-16143-60.

295 F.Supp. 289 (1969)

David M. STUDNER v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

January 27, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City (Allan H. Kamnitz and David Serko, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Carl Eardley, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen. (Sheila N. Ziff, New York City, trial attorney), for defendant.

Before RAO and FORD, Judges, and OLIVER, Senior Judge.

OLIVER, Judge:

The imported merchandise involved herein consists of certain used print rollers which were invoiced as lamp bases. The collector of customs classified the print rollers as articles, not specifically provided for, partly or wholly manufactured, in chief value of metal, under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, and assessed duty at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases