1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. 525 (1969)
 

SMITH, ET AL. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, ET AL.,

54 N.J. 525 (1969)

257 A.2d 698

LAWRENCE SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND LIVINGSTON PROPERTIES CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 15, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents (Messrs. Cummis, Kent & Radin, attorneys; Mr. David S. Litwin on the brief).

Mr. Theodore L. Abeles argued the cause for defendants, cross-appellants (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. William F. Tompkins, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N.J.Super. 444. The stay heretofore granted by the order of September 30, 1969, is vacated.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases