TOMITA v. TUCKER

Docket No. 6,201.

18 Mich. App. 559 (1969)

171 N.W.2d 564

TOMITA v. TUCKER

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Leave to appeal denied February 25, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newman & Mackay, for plaintiffs.

Daniel C. Learned, City Attorney, for defendants.

Before: LESINSKI, C.J., and QUINN and DANHOF, JJ.


QUINN, J.

At the close of plaintiffs' proofs in their action for false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution, the trial judge granted plaintiffs' motion for directed verdict on the issue of liability. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs and judgment entered thereon. Defendants' motion for new trial was denied and they appeal.

Defendants Tucker and Markham are uniformed officers in the police department of the municipal defendant. April...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases