Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements.
We find no merit in petitioner's argument that the arbitrator exceeded his power and failed to follow the procedure of CPLR article 75, within the meaning of CPLR 7511 (subd. [b], par. 1, cls. [iii], [iv]), by receiving in evidence testimony concerning alleged changes and modifications in the contract between the parties, after respondent's motion to stay arbitration had been denied by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.