1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 295 F.Supp.
  5. 295 F.Supp. 278 (1969)
 

N. ERLANGER BLUMGART CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3691; Protest No. 66/56497-35026-65.

295 F.Supp. 278 (1969)

N. ERLANGER BLUMGART CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

February 5, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City (Joshua M. Davidson and Allan H. Kamnitz, New York City, of counsel) for plaintiff.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Glenn E. Harris and Bernard J. Babb, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before RAO, Chief Judge, and FORD, Judge.

RAO, Chief Judge:

This protest involves an importation from Italy of woven fabrics composed of yarns which contain linen, nylon, and wool fibers. The merchandise was classified under item 336.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as woven fabrics of wool, other than serges, weighing over 4 ounces per square yard, and valued not over $1.26 2/3 per pound, and was assessed with duty at the rate of 37.5 cents per...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases