BD. OF COUNTY COMMRS. v. SCIOTO COUNTY BUDGET COMM.

No. 68-280.

17 Ohio St. 2d 39 (1969)

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMRS. OF SCIOTO COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SCIOTO COUNTY BUDGET COMM. ET AL.; CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 19, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles L. Huddleston, Jr., and Mr. Harry T. Herdman, for appellants.

Mr. Edward V. Leach, Jr., city solicitor, for appellee.


O'NEILL, J.

The first question to be determined by this court may be stated thus: Is it mandatory that the Board of Tax Appeals give credit for "those revenues which a subdivision receives from an additional tax or service charge voted by its electorate," as provided in Section 5739.23, Revised Code, if said revenues are used to pay expenses that are lawfully payable from the general fund?

The electorate of Scioto...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases