Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Judicial Department in November, 1927. The charges involve three specifications. The Referee to whom the matter was sent for hearing sustained two of the three charges.
We find that the record sustains Charge No. 1. We are of the opinion that the Referee was correct in not sustaining Charge 3, and it is our opinion that Charge 2 has not been sustained.
Charge 1 alleges respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.