CHRISTENSEN v. MIDSTATE AERIAL APPLICATORS CORP.

Civ. No. 8444.

166 N.W.2d 386 (1969)

Don L. CHRISTENSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MIDSTATE AERIAL APPLICATORS CORP., and Agsco Chemicals, Inc., domestic corporations, Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vogel, Bair & Graff, Mandan, for plaintiff and appellant.

Pearce, Engebretson, Anderson & Schmidt, Bismarck, for defendant and respondent Agsco Chemicals, Inc.

Donald H. Crothers, Fargo, for defendant and respondent Midstate Aerial Applicators Corp.


TEIGEN, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff has appealed from a summary judgment of dismissal of his complaint.

The motion for summary judgment alleges the complaint does not state a claim. The motion is premised on the ground that certain statutory conditions precedent to the institution of the action have not been complied with.

The plaintiff, by his complaint, claims damages for injury to and loss of his crops resulting from the use of a chemical spray...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases