NEWTON, Justice.
This is an action in eminent domain. Defendant asserts prejudice by reason of remarks of plaintiffs' attorney to the jury during argument. We do not find error of a prejudicial nature and affirm the judgment of the district court.
The alleged erroneous remarks were as follows:
"Now, the good, gracious Mr. Pilmer, he did come in with one thing. He said, `Yes, that they should have a loading pen on the north, a chute'. He didn't give...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.