PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Castillo, appeals from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful possession of marijuana.
In his brief he argues three points for reversal but in oral argument only argued the question of whether there was sufficient, competent evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment of conviction.
We have examined the three points for reversal submitted by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See Zalla v. State, Fla. 1952...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
