1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 31 A.D.2d
  5. 31 A.D.2d 482 (1969)
 

RIEMER v. RIEMER

31 A.D.2d 482 (1969)

Bernice Riemer, Respondent-Appellant, v. David Riemer, Appellant-Respondent. (Action No. 1.) (And Three Additional Actions.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 14, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold L. Fisher (Robert B. Brady and Andrew S. Fisher of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Schur, Handler & Jaffin (Jerome Handler and Herbert Feiler of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

CHRIST, Acting P. J., BRENNAN, HOPKINS, BENJAMIN and MUNDER, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

The four actions before us, which were consolidated, originally were: Action No. 1: to declare void a separation agreement between plaintiff and defendant David Riemer (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) and for a separation; Action No. 2: to declare that the plaintiff is the defendant's wife and that a divorce decree which he procured against her in Nevada is invalid; Action No. 3; to declare that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases