1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 43 Wis.2d
  5. 43 Wis.2d 465 (1969)
 

STATE v. HOLMSTROM

Nos. State 129, 130, 131.

43 Wis.2d 465 (1969)

168 N.W.2d 574

STATE, Respondent, v. HOLMSTROM, Appellant. [Three cases.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 27, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by Jack McManus of Madison.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

This appeal presents three questions:

(1) Was the jury array in Eau Claire county improperly constituted;

(2) Was there sufficient credible evidence to support the jury's verdicts that the defendant was guilty of burglary and possession of burglarious tools; and

(3) Was the district attorney's conduct improper?

Jury Array.

Prior to the trial in this case,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases