PARKER v. PERRIN


451 P.2d 49 (1969)

Oren PARKER, As Trustee and Oren Parker, Individually and As a Representative of All the Members of the International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite and Paper Mill Workers, Afl-Cio, an Unincorporated Association, Appellants, v. William PERRIN, William Riggs, Robert McCleary, Phillis Fairbrother, Harold King, Joln Paullin, Mike Hagedorn, Howard Ross, Emery Fisher, and Ivan Hartley, Individually and As Representatives of All the Members of Local No. 68, International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite and Paper Mill Workers, Afl-Cio, an Unincorporated Association, and As Representatives of All the Members of Local No. 68, Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, an Unincorporated Association, and Association of Western Pulp and Sulphite Workers, Local Union No. 68, Union Hall, Inc., a Corporation, Respondents, and the First National Bank of Oregon, a Corporation, and the United States National Bank of Oregon, a Corporation, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 19, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Bassett, Donaldson & Hafer, Seattle, Wash., and Galton & Popick, Portland.

Don S. Willner, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Willner, Bennett & Leonard, Portland, and Jack, Goodwin & Anicker, Oregon City.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LANGTRY, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The issues, evidence, and parties in this suit are substantially similar to those in Phillips v. Perrin, Or., 450 P.2d 767, decided this day. In this case, the trial court found in favor of the association and against the international union.

For the reasons set forth in Phillips v. Perrin, supra, the decree below must be reversed. Upon remand, the trial court should enter a decree awarding to the plaintiff the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases