1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 420 F.2d
  5. 420 F.2d 79 (1969)
 

YOST v. SAUTER

No. 20057.

420 F.2d 79 (1969)

Jorier Haught YOST, Appellant, v. Theta E. SAUTER et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 3, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bond L. Holford, Brentwood, Md., was on the brief for appellant. Messrs. Donald J. Caulfield and Sherman L. Cohn, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellant.

Messrs. John L. Laskey and Ernest L. Ruffner, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for appellee Sauter.

Before DANAHER, McGOWAN and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

When this appeal was first before us, we remanded to the District Court for a memorandum on the reasons for denying the motion for remittitur filed by defendant-appellant.1 Our prior opinion is attached in the Appendix. We were concerned that although plaintiff's counsel had not been guilty of any misconduct his action in resisting the remittitur enabled him to take advantage of the misconduct by defendant-appellee, which operated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases