1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 297 F.Supp.
  5. 297 F.Supp. 171 (1969)
 

R. H. MACY & CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3733; Protest No. 66/61100-11029-66.

297 F.Supp. 171 (1969)

R. H. MACY & CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

March 11, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooks & Brooks, New York City (Eugene F. Blauvelt, New York City, of counsel), and Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, by Howard Clare Carter, New York City, attys., Allerton deC. Tompkins, John D. Rode, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City, Glad & Tuttle, Los Angeles, Cal., Lane, Young & Fox, Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City, and Stein & Shostak, Los Angeles, Cal., assoc. counsel, for the plaintiff.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bernard J. Babb, New York City, for defendant.

Before RAO, FORD, and NEWMAN, Judges.

RAO, Chief Judge:

Placed in controversy by the above enumerated protest is the proper classification for customs duty purposes of a shipment from France invoiced as embroidered curtains in chief value of acetate fabric and hand-painted panels in chief value of polyester fabric. The customs authorities classified the embroidered curtains within the provisions of item 365.85 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases