ABRAHAM v. MOLER

[No. 166, September Term, 1968.]

253 Md. 215 (1969)

252 A.2d 68

ABRAHAM, ET AL. v. MOLER

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 10, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Heeney, with whom were Heeney, McAuliffe & McAuliffe on the brief for appellants.

Jack S. May, with whom were Edward C. Donahue, William A. Ehrmantraut and James P. Gleason on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SMITH, JJ.


PER CURIAM:

Appellants seek the overthrow of a $100,000 judgment against them claiming it is excessive. They present also five additional questions. They contend the appellee (Mrs. Moler) failed to produce any affirmative evidence negating contributory negligence; they claim "the verdict is contrary to the evidence;" a verdict in their favor should have been directed, they say, at the close of the evidence; they question the admissibility of the testimony of a medical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases