PARE v. RODRIQUE

[No. 194, September Term, 1969.]

256 Md. 204 (1969)

260 A.2d 313

PARE v. RODRIQUE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 22, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry J. Noyes, with whom was William R. Leckemby on the brief, for appellant.

Joseph J. D'Erasmo, with whom were Vivian V. Simpson, Joseph B. Simpson, Jr., H. Algire McFaul, William T. Wood and Simpson & Simpson on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY and DIGGES, JJ.


HAMMOND, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant raises the single issue of whether "interrogatories become continuing in nature, so as to require supplementary answers at a later date, by the simple statement of the proponent that they are in fact continuing?"

The environment in which the question arose was this. Appellant, Pare, sued appellee, Rodrique, for damages resulting from an automobile accident that occurred in August 1966. Rodrique filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases