1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 2 Cal.App.3d
  5. 2 Cal.App.3d 445 (1969)
 

MULLER v. TANNER

Docket No. 25984.

2 Cal.App.3d 445 (1969)

82 Cal. Rptr. 738

WILLIAM MULLER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SYDNEY N. TANNER, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

December 9, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William Muller, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sydney N. Tanner, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SIMS, J.

In this action plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of dismissal signed, filed and entered after his failure to post security as required by an order which determined he was a vexatious litigant and ordered him to post $5,000 in cash, or bond, within 10 days of the order. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 391-391.6.)1 His multifarious contentions are set forth in 21 points and XIII propositions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases