1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 296 F.Supp.
  5. 296 F.Supp. 143 (1969)
 

HYDE v. PITCHESS

Civ. No. 68-2021.

296 F.Supp. 143 (1969)

Elmer Robert HYDE, Petitioner, v. Peter PITCHESS, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, Respondent.

United States District Court C. D. California.

February 14, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elmer Robert Hyde, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Abrams, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

HAUK, District Judge.

Petitioner, a California state prisoner in custody prior to his trial on a charge of robbery, here seeks a writ of habeas corpus on various grounds. This Court must deny this petition. Title 28 United States Code § 2254 expressly requires exhaustion of all State remedies before petitioning the Federal Courts for a writ of habeas corpus unless:

"* * * there is either an absence of available State corrective process or the existence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases