SCHNEIDER, J.
In oral argument, appellants, appellants abjured any contention that the landowner's husband, who was present at the conference when the settlement entry was prepared and who is now the real party in interest, should be estopped to deny the validity of the settlement entry.
The position of appellants is that the "journal entry —settlement" conveyed title to appellee's land to the state of Ohio; and is based upon two arguments: First, that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
