BENADA ALUMINUM PRODUCTS COMPANY v. BLUMENTHAL

No. 68-740.

221 So.2d 207 (1969)

BENADA ALUMINUM PRODUCTS COMPANY, Appellant, v. Martin BLUMENTHAL, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horton & Schwartz, Howard R. Hirsch, Miami, for appellant.

Myers, Kaplan, Porter, Levinson & Kenin and Edwin M. Ginsburg, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.


PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant in the trial court. The single point presented is in essence an assertion that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment entered for the plaintiff after trial by the court.

The plaintiff-appellee, a business broker, sued for a commission on the sale of a large piece of machinery. His complaint alleged that the defendant-appellant employed him and agreed to pay him a commission of five per cent upon the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases