TIERNEY v. FLOWER


32 A.D.2d 392 (1969)

Elizabeth Tierney, an Infant, by Her Mother, Elizabeth M. Tierney, Respondent, v. Edward Flower, Appellant, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 7, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Koffler, Flower & Plotka (Edward Flower of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard T. Callan for respondent.

BELDOCK, P. J., CHRIST, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, JJ., concur.


RABIN, J.

The underlying problem on this appeal is whether the order under review unwarrantedly interferes with the privileged communication existing between the appellant-attorney and his clients.

In September, 1967, the appellant was retained by clients desirous of adopting a child expected soon to be born to the petitioner. Without revealing the identity of these clients, the appellant negotiated with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases