URY v. SANTEE

No. 69 C 1146.

303 F.Supp. 119 (1969)

Bernard E. URY, Louis Gottlieb, Alan Shor and James M. Gilmore, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth SANTEE, James A. Schwietert, Thelma B. Simon, Robert McHugh, William C. Orth, James Reichmann, Frank Fernholz, Lorene Burghart, J. Kroy Ostergaard, Lemuel H. Tate and Russell B. Joseph, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

August 25, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sonnenschein, Levinson, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal, Rupert J. Groh, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Matthew J. Beemsterboer, Blue Island, Ill., Robert J. Mangler, Wilmetta, Ill., William H. Alexander, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

NAPOLI, District Judge.

This cause having come on for hearing on the merits of the complaint and answers thereto, the court has considered the evidence, the defendants' motion to dismiss and the plaintiffs' memorandum in opposition thereto, and the arguments of counsel, and, being fully advised in the premises, finds that it has jurisdiction of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof, finds the facts as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases