1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 43 Wis.2d
  5. 43 Wis.2d 367 (1969)
 

LIPHFORD v. STATE

No. State 155.

43 Wis.2d 367 (1969)

168 N.W.2d 549

LIPHFORD, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 27, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Franklyn M. Gimbel and Gimbel & Gimbel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Franklyn M. Gimbel.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by Robert W. Warren, attorney general, E. Michael McCann, district attorney of Milwaukee county, and Terence T. Evans, assistant district attorney, and oral argument by G. George Lawrence, assistant district attorney.

HANLEY, J.

Two issues are presented by this appeal:

(1) Was it prejudicial error to permit the state to question the defendant concerning the number of his prior convictions after the defendant admitted having been convicted of a crime; and

(2) Was defendant's statement to the detective admissible?

Number of Prior Convictions.

In State v. Midell (1968), 39 Wis.2d 733,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases