1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 301 F.Supp.
  5. 301 F.Supp. 97 (1969)
 

LEA v. CONE MILLS CORPORATION

No. C-176-D-66.

301 F.Supp. 97 (1969)

Shirley LEA, Romona Pinnix, and Annie Tinnin, Plaintiffs, v. CONE MILLS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. North Carolina, Durham Division.

July 29, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Conrad O. Pearson and W. G. Pearson, Durham, N. C.; Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning, Charlotte, N. C.; and Jack Greenberg, Leroy D. Clark and Robert Belton, New York City, N. Y., for plaintiffs.

Thornton H. Brooks, of McLendon, Brim, Brooks, Pierce & Daniels, Greensboro, N. C., for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

EDWIN M. STANLEY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs, Shirley Lea, Romona Pinnix, and Annie Tinnin, all Negro females residing in Orange County, North Carolina, seek to restrain the defendant, Cone Mills Corporation, from continuing or maintaining any policy or practice limiting or otherwise interfering with the rights of plaintiffs, and others similarly situated, to enjoy equal employment opportunities without regard to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases